Experiments and surveys are the primary tools of this research method to create specific results, even when independent or interdependent factors are present.
Because of the subjective nature of qualitative data and its origin in single contexts, it is difficult to apply conventional standards of reliability and validity. There are some things to consider when exploring the concepts related to the number fetishism that blinds people to the pitfalls of accepting quantitative research at face value and being overly reliant on the normal distribution.
Since psychologists study people, the traditional approach to science is not seen as an appropriate way of carrying out research, since it fails to capture the totality of human experience and the essence of what it is to be human.
This is just an example among many from which we can deduce that each tentative of altering the world, the object of our scientific investigation, it is not really possible not to do errors; so, the objectivity that the scientific community vaunted is not actually possible at any level, and independently by the methodology, whether quantitative or qualitative it is.
Survey instruments are vulnerable to errors such as mistakes in measurement and flawed sampling techniques. Even if surveys or interviews are distributed to each individual, their personal information does not make it to the form.
All research involves cost. Key Features Quantitative researchers try to control extraneous variables by conducting their studies in the lab.
You can speak with individuals on the phone, conduct surveys online, or use other remote methods that allow for information to move from one party to the other.