Should psle be abolished

Is psle necessary

While education is supposed to be a ladder for social mobility, the competitive exam at the PSLE may be against the spirit of education. First, the national exam puts too much pressure on students and families. For any meaningful discourse and constructive policy review to take place, proposers of policy change cannot merely focus on the benefits. The PM Lee recently pointed out the increasing availability of choice as a way to alleviate the problems of the national exam. Every policy decision has consequences and every argument proposing major changes can be responded to by simply highlighting the negative consequences. However, are the harms sufficient justification for removing the exam altogether? But at the end of the day, we still need to have some scheme to differentiate capabilities, reward talents and provide incentives for hard work.

If those who want to abolish PSLE still wish to push for it, they must be able to explain why the benefits of doing so outweighs the cost of eroding a key system constraint i.

I expect education to feature heavily in these discussions.

why we should not abolish psle

Moreover, we may also set up some pilot secondary schools that admit students based on their own standard other than the PSLE, and parents have the choice to opt out the PSLE to go for such schools. As good as the plan may sound, it goes against a fundamental principle of any national exam in the world: standardization.

However, many parents feel that tuition will help their children to do better.

Psle debate

Soft skills may be compromised for exam techniques, and we run the risk of breeding a generation that is less able to compete in the global talent pool. Popular opinions have been rising for scrapping the PSLE, for it puts unnecessary stress on young students and limits their holistic development. This is what quality policy discourse should look like — one based on well-thought through ideas, the consideration of trade-offs and a judgment call on what one is willing to forgo. Trade-offs must again be made. But at the end of the day, we still need to have some scheme to differentiate capabilities, reward talents and provide incentives for hard work. The PM Lee recently pointed out the increasing availability of choice as a way to alleviate the problems of the national exam. According to an online poll, the PSLE has been ranked the top ten most pressing issues faced by Singaporeans. However, many parents feel that tuition will help their children to do better. Our answers will show us why we are willing to make the trade-offs we make. A commentary. With increasing unequal distribution of resources, such as the implementation of integrated programs by some top-notched junior colleges, the exam scores for the PSLE have more far-reaching consequences in determining how far a student can go in the future. For example, we can enhance the exercise of the Direct School Admission that allows students talented in non-academic areas to be admitted before they go for the leaving exam.

Single dimensional Thirdly, the exam-oriented philosophy of education encourages other undesirable phenomena: too much emphasis on study and too little on play and co-curricular activities. Often, this is where the discourse ends.

Ong ye kung psle

Even though the MOE may stop ranking secondary schools, informal ranking by parents based on cut-off points always exists. Moreover, we may also set up some pilot secondary schools that admit students based on their own standard other than the PSLE, and parents have the choice to opt out the PSLE to go for such schools. She said, "MOE's view is that it shouldn't be the case that because you cannot afford tuition you should not be able to pass your exam, which is why we have introduced the Learning Support Programmes. I wish we were a bit like Hogwarts, where you have the sorting hat that decides which school you go to, but we don't have a sorting hat and how do we decide who goes to which school? A conversation centred on trade-offs can advance our education policy discourse. Pressure Let us examine the reasons why some people call for the removal of the exam. According to an online poll, the PSLE has been ranked the top ten most pressing issues faced by Singaporeans.

Students in Finland do not take any standardized exams until they are 16 years old, when Singaporeans students have become veterans for exams.

I hope that under our system, each person can be the best he or she can be, whether or not that person has a university degree. This may lead to a situation where students coming from richer families get richer while students coming from poorer families get left behind.

However, proponents of the system have been equally strong in their support for the exam, arguing that no viable alternative exists to ensure the fairness of selection. No, says Indranee She also said that MOE is making available more resources to level the playing fields between the students who come from various income backgrounds.

psle stress

It is high time for us to engage in the debate, as education is becoming more and more important in determining the future of a child and the the nation as a whole. It need not be so.

psle scrapped

If it's decided on 'does the Principal know your father or your mother?

Rated 8/10 based on 24 review
Download
S’pore shouldn’t overcorrect education system and undermine its rigour: Ong Ye Kung